by Karin Yuklea
5 minutes • AML • March 7, 2025
What is AML Transaction Monitoring & How Does It Work?
With banking and online shopping happening 24 hours a day, seven days a week, the flow of money is constant—and so is the risk of illicit activity. Anti-money laundering (AML) Transaction Monitoring continuously scrutinizes financial transactions to identify patterns, anomalies, or behaviors that might signal money laundering or other nefarious activities. The AML transaction monitoring market is expected to reach $6.8 billion by 2028, a CAGR of 17% since 2023.
At its core, transaction monitoring is about keeping a close eye on the movement of money. In this article, we’ll break down what this entails, transaction monitoring’s core components, red flags to watch for, underlying technology, and more.
Key Takeaways
- AML transaction monitoring acts as a sophisticated radar system, scanning banks’ transactional data for unusual patterns that may indicate financial crime.
- Transaction monitoring systems flag unusual patterns, including unfamiliar cash activity and structuring, potentially triggering a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR).
- Red flags that transaction monitoring systems can detect include unusual transaction volume and velocity, activity involving high-risk geographies, activity that doesn’t align with a company’s profile, and more.
- Key technology that supports AML transaction monitoring includes rules-based systems, AI, machine learning, and real-time monitoring to name a few.
How AML Transaction Monitoring Works
By analyzing vast amounts of transactional data, banks and financial institutions can spot unusual patterns that deviate from what’s considered “normal” behavior. Think of it as a sophisticated radar system scanning for any signs of trouble.
Key components of AML Transaction Monitoring systems include:
1. Data Analysis & Pattern Recognition
Modern systems use a combination of:
- Rule-Based Logic: Predefined thresholds or patterns—like a transaction or series of transactions just under a reporting limit—alert the system.
- Advanced Analytics: Cutting-edge machine learning algorithms continuously learn from historical data, adapting to new methods that criminals might use.
2. A Risk-Based Approach to Detection
Not all transactions are created equal. By considering factors such as customer profile, geographic location, and transaction type, these systems prioritize alerts, ensuring that high-risk activities get the attention they deserve while reducing false alarms from routine transactions.
The State of Anti-Money Laundering 2025
Criminals are exploiting new technologies, leaving outdated AML programs vulnerable. Feedzai surveyed 300+ AML professionals to uncover the latest trends […]
3. Integration with Other AML Processes
Transaction monitoring isn’t a lone ranger. It works hand-in-hand with:
- Know Your Customer (KYC): Establishes the customer’s identity and the purpose and nature of the account. AML transaction monitoring will flag any conflicts or incongruities with this information.
- Customer Due Diligence: Continuously verifies the legitimacy of customer information and assesses their risk.
- Sanctions Screening: Ensures transactions don’t involve sanctioned individuals or entities.
4. Harnessing Technology & Automation
The latest technology enhances transaction monitoring:
- Machine Learning & AI: Adapt and improve detection methods by learning from previous data.
- Real-Time Processing: Spot suspicious transactions as they happen.
- Big Data Analytics: Manage and process huge volumes of data quickly and efficiently.
5. Regulatory Compliance
Regulators worldwide mandate robust transaction monitoring systems. They ensure financial institutions maintain audit trails, detailed reporting, and the flexibility to adapt to emerging threats.
Red Flags in AML Transaction Monitoring
Red flags in transaction monitoring are the clues of a crime scene. They are the specific indicators or patterns that suggest suspicious or illicit activity is underway.
Here are some common red flags to look out for:
AML Risk Indicator
Description
Potential Suspicious Activity
Investigation Considerations
Unusual Transaction Volume / Frequency
A significant deviation from established transaction patterns, including sudden spikes in volume, value, or frequency, or a shift from low-risk to high-risk activity.
Unexplained increase in transactions, especially if inconsistent with customer profile. Rapid changes in transaction behavior.
Review customer history, business profile, and source of funds. Compare current activity to past patterns. Consider external factors (e.g., seasonal business changes).
Structuring (Smurfing)
Multiple transactions conducted below reporting thresholds to evade scrutiny. Often involves round numbers or similar amounts across multiple accounts.
Numerous transactions just below reporting thresholds. Consistent use of multiple accounts. Related parties involved in transactions.
Analyze transaction amounts and timing. Identify related accounts and beneficiaries. Look for patterns of small, regular deposits or withdrawals.
Inconsistent Customer Profile
Transactions that don't align with the customer's known income, business operations, or geographic location.
Transactions unrelated to stated business activities. Funds flowing to/from high-risk jurisdictions without justification. Large, unexplained deposits or withdrawals.
Verify customer information and business activities. Analyze transaction purpose and beneficiaries. Compare transaction details to the customer's stated profile.
High Velocity Funds Movement
Quick, sequential transfers between accounts, often involving multiple jurisdictions, designed to obscure the source or destination of funds (layering).
Multiple rapid transfers, especially to/from offshore accounts. Complex routing of funds. Lack of clear business purpose for transfers.
Trace the flow of funds. Identify all involved parties and jurisdictions. Examine the timing and sequence of transfers.
Round Value Transactions
Frequent use of round figures (e.g., $10,000, $50,000) may indicate non-commercial or structured activity.
Consistent use of round dollar amounts. Lack of fractional amounts. Transactions coinciding with reporting thresholds.
Investigate the purpose of round number transactions. Compare to typical business practices. Consider in conjunction with other red flags.
High-Risk Jurisdiction Involvement
Transactions involving countries with weak AML/CFT controls, sanctioned entities, or high-risk geographic locations.
Funds flowing to/from sanctioned countries or entities. Transactions originating from or destined to high-risk jurisdictions. Use of offshore accounts in secrecy jurisdictions.
Screen all parties against sanctions lists. Assess the AML/CFT compliance of involved jurisdictions. Scrutinize the business rationale for high-risk jurisdiction involvement.
Complex Transaction Structures
Funds moved through multiple layers of accounts or entities without a clear economic or business purpose, obscuring the beneficial owner.
Use of shell companies or complex ownership structures. Multiple intermediaries involved in transactions. Lack of transparency in fund flows.
Analyze the structure of the transaction. Identify the ultimate beneficial owner. Determine the legitimate business purpose of the complex structure.
One or more of these risk indicators warrants further investigation.
Transaction Monitoring in Action: How It All Comes Together
Imagine a mid-sized business account that routinely handles predictable transactions—such as supplier invoices and employee payroll. Suddenly, within just a few days, something odd happens:
- Unusual Transaction Size and Frequency: The account begins exhibiting increased activity, including several larger-than-usual transactions. This includes both electronic transfers and cash withdrawals.
- Strategic Structuring (Cash Focus): A significant portion of the increased activity involves cash. Large cash withdrawals are broken down into multiple smaller amounts, often deposited into various accounts or used to purchase various instruments (money orders, etc.) just below the cash reporting threshold. This is a classic sign of structuring to avoid reporting requirements.
- Geographic Anomalies: Some of the cash withdrawals are followed by wire transfers to accounts in jurisdictions known for lax AML controls. Alternatively, the cash may be physically transported to these jurisdictions.
- Profile Mismatch: The volume and value of these transactions, especially the increased cash activity, don’t align with the business’s usual operations. The stated business purpose doesn’t justify the large cash withdrawals or subsequent transfers.
The bank’s transaction monitoring system flags this pattern, particularly the unusual cash activity and structuring. An AML analyst digs deeper by cross-referencing the customer’s KYC details. The investigation reveals that these transactions, especially the cash component, lack a clear, legitimate purpose, prompting the bank to escalate the case and potentially file a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR).
The Tech Behind AML Transaction Monitoring
AML Transaction monitoring leverages various technologies and methods that can be broadly categorized into traditional, rule-based systems and advanced analytics. Here are some key types:
Rule-based Systems
- Static Rules & Thresholds: Flag transactions that exceed predefined limits.
- Pros & Cons: Easy to implement but can sometimes generate too many false positives.
Statistical & Behavioral Analytics
- Anomaly Detection: Establishes normal behavior patterns and flags deviations.
- Behavioral Modeling: Tracks trends over time to spot inconsistencies.
Machine Learning & Artificial Intelligence
- Supervised Learning: Uses historical data with known outcomes to train algorithms.
- Unsupervised Learning: Identifies new, evolving patterns without relying on labeled data.
- Continuous Improvement: Learns and adapts to capture emerging threats, reducing false alerts.
Real-time Monitoring & Big Data Platforms
- Streaming Analytics: Tools like that analyze transactions in real time.
- Scalable Infrastructure: Cloud-based solutions ensure the system can handle large volumes of data seamlessly.
Network & Graph Analytics
- Relationship Mapping: Visualizes connections between accounts to uncover hidden networks.
- Visualization Tools: Assist compliance teams in spotting irregular patterns quickly.
Integration with Other Systems
- KYC and Sanctions Screening: Combines various data sources to build a comprehensive risk profile.
- Data Aggregation: Merges information from multiple channels for a holistic view of customer behavior.
Each of these technologies plays a role in a layered approach to transaction monitoring. Traditional methods can catch obvious red flags. Meanwhile, advanced analytics and AI can identify more sophisticated or emerging patterns. The combination of these capabilities makes the overall system more robust and adaptive to the evolving landscape of financial crime.
AML transaction monitoring is the digital watchdog that safeguards our financial systems. Blending traditional rule-based approaches with advanced analytics and AI offers a robust defense against money laundering. Whether it’s through spotting red flags, integrating with KYC processes, or leveraging real-time data analysis, transaction monitoring plays a pivotal role in maintaining financial integrity in our ever-evolving digital world.
Related Resources
- Report: The State of Anti-Money Laundering 2025
- Solution Guide: Anti-Money Laundering Transaction Monitoring
- Solution Sheet: AML Transaction Monitoring
- Solution: AI-powered Transaction Monitoring
All expertise and insights are from human Feedzians, but we may leverage AI to enhance phrasing or efficiency. Welcome to the future.